This 18-minute demo shows you two ways to integrate generative AI into your document processing pipeline.
Supercharge AI automation with the power of reliable, accurate OCR
Increase straight-through document processing with data-driven insights
Integrate reliable Document AI in your automation workflows with just a few lines of code
PROCESS UNDERSTANDING
PROCESS OPTIMIZATION
Purpose-built AI for limitless automation.
Kick-start your automation with pre-trained AI extraction models.
Meet our contributors, explore assets, and more.
BY INDUSTRY
BY BUSINESS PROCESS
BY TECHNOLOGY
Build
Integrate advanced text recognition into your applications via API.
Production-grade document parsing infrastructure for AI workflows.
AI-ready document data for context grounded GenAI output with RAG.
Explore purpose-built AI for Intelligent Automation.
Grow
Connect with peers and experienced OCR, IDP, and AI professionals.
A distinguished title awarded to developers who demonstrate exceptional expertise in ABBYY AI.
Explore
Insights
Services

New global research commissioned by ABBYY reveals that AI is delivering value across Australian organizations, but business leaders remain divided over who should ultimately answer when AI systems produce harmful or incorrect outputs.
The ABBYY Who Answers for AI: The Governance Gap report surveyed 1,200 senior managers in businesses of 100+ employees across the US, UK, France, Germany, Australia, and Singapore, and Opinium conducted the study. In Australia, views on responsibility spread evenly: 27% believe the organization using AI should bear responsibility, another 27% think it should be shared between the organization and the vendor, 17% point to the AI vendor alone, 15% name the individual or end user, and 14% look to policymakers and regulators.
Australian leaders show reasonable confidence in AI accuracy, with a net trust of 68% that AI produces accurate outputs. Confidence drops sharply around risk, however. Only 17% completely trust AI systems to operate without introducing unacceptable risks, and net trust for that question sits at 60%. With so many leaders uncertain that AI can operate safely, defining who answers for those risks becomes critical.
Concerns about output reliability reinforce this point. More than a quarter (28%) of Australian organizations flagged hallucinations leading to incorrect business decisions as an AI-related security risk, and 45% identified confidential data leakage as their top security concern.
Australia sets the global benchmark for human involvement, with 61% of business leaders saying humans review all important AI decisions before action is taken, the highest of any market surveyed. Yet gaps remain: 23% say human review happens only after AI decisions have been implemented, and 13% report no formal approach at all, meaning 26% of organizations using AI operate without meaningful human oversight.
Effective governance is helping Australian organizations realize greater value from AI. More than three quarters (76%) have a formal AI governance framework in place, 75% say governance has made their AI initiatives more successful, and just 5% say it made them less successful. Among organizations with governance frameworks, 45% report that their AI initiatives exceeded expectations, and 64% found it easier to scale AI beyond the pilot stage.
Data quality remains the leading obstacle to stronger returns, with 22% of Australian leaders citing it as the biggest barrier to achieving greater ROI from AI.
Businesses are embracing AI, but our research shows that many are still struggling with key questions around accountability, governance and ROI. Senior management need to do a better job of communicating what their responsible AI policies are companywide. In addition, AI requires organizations to know where data comes from, whether it can be trusted, how it can be used, and where it is stored and processed. As data sovereignty grows in importance, a shift toward machine-readable controls that govern data throughout its lifecycle is required to ensure consistent compliance.
Roman Kilun, Chief Compliance Officer at ABBYY
Organizations we work with are moving beyond pilots and proofs of concept into execution, and clear frameworks and a shared understanding of responsibility are critical to building confidence in AI. At ABBYY, we’re committed to being transparent about our own governance approach and supporting customers on that journey.
Roman Kilun, Chief Compliance Officer at ABBYY
Access the full 2026 ABBYY report, Who Answers for AI: The Governance Gap, here for more information.
Find more information about how ABBYY improves data governance through the document AI standard DocLang, and its commitment to secure, transparent and resilient cloud services through its AI risk management policy and BSI C5 initiatives.
Opinium research of 200 senior managers or above in companies of 100+ employees in the UK. Part of wider survey of 1,200 senior managers or above in companies of 100+ employees in the US, UK, France, Germany, Australia and Singapore. Research undertaken between 15 July – 3 August 2026.
ABBYY helps organizations optimize processes, accelerate decisions, and drive better outcomes with Process AI and Document AI. More than 10,000 enterprises, including many Fortune 500 companies, rely on ABBYY’s 35 years of innovation to turn business data into actionable insights that improve the way we work and live. Headquartered in Austin, Texas, and offices in 13 countries, ABBYY leads the way for smarter agentic automation. For more information, visit www.abbyy.com/company and follow us on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok.
ABBYY can either be a registered trademark or a trademark and can also be a logo, a company name (or part of it), or part of a product name of ABBYY group companies and may not be used without consent of its respective owners.