This 18-minute demo shows you two ways to integrate generative AI into your document processing pipeline.
Supercharge AI automation with the power of reliable, accurate OCR
Increase straight-through document processing with data-driven insights
Integrate reliable Document AI in your automation workflows with just a few lines of code
PROCESS UNDERSTANDING
PROCESS OPTIMIZATION
Purpose-built AI for limitless automation.
Kick-start your automation with pre-trained AI extraction models.
Meet our contributors, explore assets, and more.
BY INDUSTRY
BY BUSINESS PROCESS
BY TECHNOLOGY
Build
Integrate advanced text recognition into your applications via API.
Production-grade document parsing infrastructure for AI workflows.
AI-ready document data for context grounded GenAI output with RAG.
Explore purpose-built AI for Intelligent Automation.
Grow
Connect with peers and experienced OCR, IDP, and AI professionals.
A distinguished title awarded to developers who demonstrate exceptional expertise in ABBYY AI.
Explore
Insights
Services

New global research commissioned by ABBYY reveals that AI now touches every business in Singapore, yet leaders remain divided over who should ultimately answer when AI systems produce harmful or incorrect outputs.
The ABBYY Who Answers for AI: The Governance Gap report surveyed 1,200 senior managers in businesses of 100+ employees across the US, UK, France, Germany, Australia, and Singapore, and Opinium conducted the study. In Singapore, 100% of organizations use AI technology, yet only 15% completely trust it to produce accurate outputs. On the question of responsibility, Singapore leaders lean toward shared accountability more than any other market, with 41% believing responsibility should sit jointly with the organization and the vendor, compared with 31% globally.
While 100% of surveyed organizations in Singapore reported using AI, confidence has not kept pace. Just 43% net trust AI systems to operate without introducing unacceptable risks, and only 50% net trust AI to protect confidential information. Regulatory confidence sits slightly higher, with 53% trusting AI to comply with applicable regulations. Confidential data leakage ranks as the top AI-related security concern, and 83% of leaders say they worry about the legal and reputational risks of AI non-compliance, as well as becoming dependent on one or more AI providers, which could reduce long-term trust and returns.
Singapore stands out for its strong human-in-the-loop culture. Only 6% of organizations report no formal approach to human oversight, one of the lowest figures across the survey. This commitment to keeping people involved in important AI decisions reflects a market that values control alongside innovation.
Effective governance is helping Singapore organizations realize greater value from AI. Nine in 10 (90%) have a formal AI governance framework in place, and 85% say governance has made their AI initiatives more successful. Governance also made it easier to develop (50%), scale (52%), and encourage adoption of AI systems (60%). Encouragingly, 85% of organizations have assessed whether their AI systems can navigate different geographical regions, signaling maturity on data sovereignty.
Even so, tension remains. Nearly half (49%) agree that AI is being adopted faster than their organization can effectively govern it, while 73% believe their governance approach balances risk mitigation with the speed of AI delivery. Data quality stands as the single biggest barrier to greater ROI, cited by 20% of leaders. Understanding accountability also thins further down the organization: 92% of senior leadership know who is responsible for managing AI, but that awareness drops among junior employees.
Businesses are embracing AI, but our research shows that many are still struggling with key questions around accountability, governance and ROI. Senior management need to do a better job of communicating what their responsible AI policies are companywide. In addition, AI requires organizations to know where data comes from, whether it can be trusted, how it can be used, and where it is stored and processed. As data sovereignty grows in importance, a shift toward machine-readable controls that govern data throughout its lifecycle is required to ensure consistent compliance.
Roman Kilun, Chief Compliance Officer at ABBYY
Organizations we work with are moving beyond pilots and proofs of concept into execution, and clear frameworks and a shared understanding of responsibility are critical to building confidence in AI. At ABBYY, we’re committed to being transparent about our own governance approach and supporting customers on that journey.
Roman Kilun, Chief Compliance Officer at ABBYY
Access the full 2026 ABBYY Who Answers for AI: The Governance Gap report for more information.
Find more information about how ABBYY improves data governance through the document AI standard DocLang, and its commitment to secure, transparent and resilient cloud services through its AI risk management policy and BSI C5 initiatives.
Opinium research of 1,200 senior managers or above in companies of 100+ employees in the US, UK, France, Germany, Australia, and Singapore. Research undertaken between 15 July and 3 August 2026.
ABBYY helps organizations optimize processes, accelerate decisions, and drive better outcomes with Process AI and Document AI. More than 10,000 enterprises, including many Fortune 500 companies, rely on ABBYY’s 35 years of innovation to turn business data into actionable insights that improve the way we work and live. Headquartered in Austin, Texas, and offices in 13 countries, ABBYY leads the way for smarter agentic automation. For more information, visit www.abbyy.com/company and follow us on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok.
ABBYY can either be a registered trademark or a trademark and can also be a logo, a company name (or part of it), or part of a product name of ABBYY group companies and may not be used without consent of its respective owners.